Marjorie Gladman vs Carolin Babcock Head to Head Stats

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Gladman vs C. Babcock

Marjorie Gladman

USA

3

Win

Played

1

Win

117

Age

113

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Plays

Carolin Babcock

USA

3

Win

Played

1

Win

117

Age

113

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-To-Head: Gladman 3 - 1 Babcock

They have played 10 sets in total, with Marjorie Gladman winning 8 and Carolin Babcock winning 2. The last match between Carolin Babcock and Marjorie Gladman was at the East Hampton, 29-07-1935, Round: , Surface: Grass, with Carolin Babcock getting the victory 6-0 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Gladman	3
Babcock	1

Last H2H Matches:

() East Hampton(07-29-35)

Stats

Carolin Babcock

Marjorie Gladman

() Los Angeles Pac Southwest(09-16-32)

Stats

Marjorie Gladman

Carolin Babcock

() Los Angeles SoCal Chps(05-10-30)

Stats

Marjorie Gladman

Carolin Babcock

M. Gladman vs C. Babcock H2H Profile

M. Gladman	Stats	C. Babcock
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
72.18% (384-148)	Career Total W/L	68.44% (167-77)
1	Grass	1
2	Hard	0
3	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. Gladman vs C. Babcock Match Preview

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Marjorie Gladman has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Carolin Babcock has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Marjorie Gladman, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Carolin Babcock has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Marjorie Gladman has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Carolin Babcock has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Marjorie Gladman has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Carolin Babcock winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Marjorie Gladman has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 86% (W/L 68/ 11), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 68% (W/L 192/ 91). Carolin Babcock has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 74% (W/L 14/ 5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 4/ 3).
Player level: In the last year, Marjorie Gladman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0), where as Carolin Babcock has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 5 times before with Marjorie Gladman winning 4 times and Carolin Babcock being victorious 1 times. They have played 10 sets in total, with Marjorie Gladman winning 8 and Carolin Babcock winning 2. The last match between Carolin Babcock and Marjorie Gladman was at the East Hampton, 29-07-1935, Round: , Surface: Grass, with Carolin Babcock getting the victory 6-0 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Marjorie Gladman has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Carolin Babcock has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Marjorie Gladman has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Carolin Babcock has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Marjorie Gladman has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Carolin Babcock has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Marjorie Gladman vs Carolin Babcock Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Gladman vs C. Babcock H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. Gladman	Stats	C. Babcock
4	H2H Matches Won	1
8	Sets Won	2
50	Games Won	29
0:0:0	Avg. Match Time	0:0:0
80% (4/5)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	20% (1/5)
100% (4/4)	1st Set Won → Match Won	100% (1/1)
0% (0/4)	1st Set Won → Match Lost	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost → Match Won	0% (0/4)

Recent Performance Stats

M. Gladman Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Melbourne Hard - 05-06-1961
Ann JenkinsA. Jenkins	L	3-6 6-4 8-6	Stats
Melbourne - 24-11-1960
R3 Jan LehaneJ. Lehane	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
Melbourne - 23-11-1959
R2 Judy TegartJ. Tegart	L	6-1 6-2	Stats
South Orange - 01-08-1955
R2 Janet HoppsJ. Hopps	L	W/O	Stats
Haverford - 18-07-1955
R3 Karol FagerosK. Fageros	W	6-3 4-6 7-5	Stats

View All

C. Babcock Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Seabright - 27-07-1944
Doris HartD. Hart	L	6-4 6-0	Stats
R4 Eleanor PurdyE. Purdy	W	6-4 1-6 6-2	Stats
Seabright - 22-07-1940
R4 Helen BernhardH. Bernhard	L	6-4 7-5	Stats
R3 Margaret Osborne DupontM. Osborne	W	6-4 6-2	Stats
Manchester-on-Sea - 14-08-1938
R3 Sissy MaddenS. Madden	W	6-3 7-5	Stats

View All

M. Gladman vs C. Babcock Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. Gladman	Stats	C. Babcock
72.18% (384/148)	YTD Win/Loss	68.44% (167/77)
69.55% (797/349)	Sets Win/Loss	67.06% (340/167)
100.00% (6061/0)	Games Win/Loss	59.08% (2594/1797)
75.00% (75/25)	Hard Win/Loss	69.79% (67/29)
68.63% (35/16)	Clay Win/Loss	57.14% (4/3)
73.68% (14/5)	Indoor Hard W/L	0% (0/0)
67.84% (192/91)	Grass Win/Loss	67.21% (82/40)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
55.32% (26/21)	Slam W/L	68.57% (24/11)
0% (0/0)	Cups W/L	33.33% (1/2)
73% (374/515)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	70% (160/230)
58% (66/114)	Deciding Set Win %	57% (25/44)
93% (369/344)	1st Set Won, Won Match	93% (156/145)
7% (369/24)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	6% (156/10)
20% (147/30)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	20% (76/15)